[{"label":"Home","url":"https:\/\/www.pbo-dpb.ca\/en"},{"label":"Publications","url":"https:\/\/www.pbo-dpb.ca\/en\/publications"},{"label":"Investment Tax Credit for Clean Technology Manufacturing","url":"https:\/\/www.pbo-dpb.ca\/en\/publications\/LEG-2324-010-S--investment-tax-credit-clean-technology-manufacturing--credit-impot-investissement-fabrication-technologies-propres"}]

Investment Tax Credit for Clean Technology Manufacturing

Published on September 28, 2023 PDF(opens a new window)

This note estimates the total cost of the refundable investment tax credit for Clean Technology Manufacturing, proposed in Budget 2023, which equals to 30 per cent of the capital cost of eligible property associated with eligible activities.

Budget 2023 proposed to introduce a refundable investment tax credit for Clean Technology Manufacturing equal to 30 per cent of the capital cost of eligible property associated with eligible activities.

Eligible property includes new machinery and equipment used to manufacture or process key clean technologies, and extract, process, or recycle key critical minerals.[^1] Eligible activities include extraction, processing, or recycling of critical minerals; manufacturing of renewable or nuclear energy equipment; processing or recycling of nuclear fuels and heavy water; manufacturing of grid-scale electrical energy storage equipment; manufacturing of zero-emission vehicles; and, manufacturing or processing of certain upstream components and materials for the above activities.[^2]

The credit would apply to property that is acquired and becomes available for use on or after January 1, 2024, subject to a phase out starting in 2032 and ending in 2034.

The PBO estimates that the investments Tax Credit for Clean Technology Manufacturing will reduce federal revenues by $4.3 billion from 2023-24 to 2027-28.

  • Estimates are presented on an accrual basis as would appear in the budget and public accounts.
  • A positive number implies a deterioration in the budgetary balance (lower revenues or higher spending). A negative number implies an improvement in the budgetary balance (higher revenues or lower spending).
  • Totals may not add due to rounding

Cost of extracting, processing, and recycling key critical minerals

Data from Natural Resources Canada (NRCan) on historical expenditures for critical mineral extraction by expenditure category was used to compute the cost of investments in new machinery and equipment as a share of total capital expenditures. NRCan also provided data on advanced projects and planned total investment in the critical mineral industry over the next 10 years. Total capital spending intentions and the historical share of machinery and equipment was used to project new investments to 2028. 

Cost of manufacturing zero-emission vehicles

Total vehicles produced in Canada was projected considering historical vehicle production, supply chain issues, trends and other economic variables. During the pandemic, the number of vehicles produced in Canada declined, dropping from nearly 2 million vehicles produced in 2019 to 1.1 million in 2021. We estimated a gradual return to pre-pandemic levels.

Data from T2 tax returns, from 2010 to 2021, was used to identify total capital acquisitions for corporations that manufacture vehicles.[^3] We then estimated the ratio of capital costs per vehicle produced in Canada and took a weighted historical average.

Using the historical average of capital acquisitions to production, we multiplied this ratio by our projected total vehicle production to approximate the yearly total capital acquisitions in the motor vehicle manufacturing industry. We grew costs by the PBO’s internal projection of price deflator of investment in machinery and equipment.

Next, we isolated total electric vehicles (EV) manufacturing in Canada using T2 and public data. Currently, EV manufacturing in Canada is minimal. Therefore, to project forward the proportion of EV manufacturing in Canada we considered both the demand and supply side. On the demand side, we treated the federal government’s announced sales targets[^4] as exogenous and assumed a 3 per cent growth in new vehicle registrations per year, adjusting for the decline seen during the pandemic. To calculate the growth in EV manufacturing, we considered the change in EV sales and production in Canada. These projections considered historical EV sales trends, changes in the supply chain, the federal government’s sales targets for EVs, announcements by vehicle manufacturing companies in Canada, capital acquisitions for motor vehicle electrical and electronic equipment manufacturing and other economic variables.

Lastly, we multiplied the forecasted share of EV manufacturing in Canada by the ratio of total acquisitions to production in order to get the cost of manufacturing for EVs.

Cost of manufacturing of batteries and recharging systems

The Investment Tax Credit for Clean Technology Manufacturing is not available for property used in the production of battery cells or modules if such production benefits from direct support through a Special Contribution Agreement with the Government of Canada. Therefore, the Volkswagen and Stellantis agreements are not eligible. Due to the limited information available for battery production, we used company and media press releases to estimate the future capacity of battery manufacturing in Canada. Material and price assumptions were taken from the Trillium report. To get the eligible costs under this tax credit, we estimated the capital to output ratio for machinery and equipment and multiplied that by the current expenses.

To estimate the capital to output ratio for this sector, we took our projection of EV sales previously used to estimate the manufacturing costs for EVs and estimated a ratio of recharging system for each new EV sold. We grew the forecasted cost of manufacturing and installing a recharging station by the PBO’s projection of price deflator of investment in machinery and equipment. We calculated a capital to output ratio to predict the cost eligible under this investment tax credit.

Cost of manufacturing other clean technologies

PBO used past data from schedule 8 of the T2 to determine the amount qualifying corporations spent in total acquisitions, excluding classes 1, 3, and 6, on other clean technologies manufacturing. Total acquisitions were grown using the average growth rate over 2023-2028 of the total net new eligible investments to the Investment Tax Credit in Clean Electricity and Clean Technology.[^5]

The latest data for projects was estimated as of September 11th, 2023. Only projects publicly announced as of this time were included in our projection.

Our estimate includes only the most advanced projects in the mining sector, but there is no guarantee that all projects will be carried out and qualify for the tax credit.

Historical data for clean technology manufacturing is very limited, especially in the EV sector. Investment is expected to increase significantly, but as of writing this note, very few EVs are currently produced in Canada. The federal government’s sales targets were treated as exogenous for new EV sales. From 2020 to 2022, supply chain issues have impacted motor vehicle manufacturing and investment. We assumed a gradual increase back to pre-pandemic levels.

We used NAICS codes to identify corporations that may have eligible capital acquisitions under this tax credit. NAICS are self-reported in the T2 leap and therefore all qualifying corporations and investments may not have been captured in our estimation.

Battery manufacturing is extremely limited in Canada at this time and therefore we relied on company releases and took that as given. This may result in a possible overestimation in the short term on the capacity of battery production.

Costs to produce EVs and related products such as recharging systems may decline as new technology is introduced resulting in uncertainty to our cost estimates.

PDF